Mark O. Freeman
The goal, of course, is to get the most for the least work. In the signal analysis and processing world, this is strongly influenced by how one chooses to represent information. In 1822, Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier devised an excellent way to do this: represent a signal as the sum of its frequencies. Power spectra, carrier frequencies and bandwidths, clock frequencies, brain activity frequency bands—these global characterizations provide much information in a concise manner. Some of the power of this representation begins to fade, though, when one attempts to represent information that changes its character unpredictably during the course of the signal. The standard analogy is a musical score. A global representation like the Fourier transform will tell what notes were played somewhere within the piece of music, but the timing of the notes is buried in a complicated frequency representation. A better representation, like the musical score, tells what notes were played when.
This article is only available as a PDF.
Publish Date: 01 August 1993
Log in or Become a member to view the full text of this article.
This article may be available for purchase via the search at Optica Publishing Group.
Optica Members get the full text of Optics & Photonics News, plus a variety of other member benefits.
Ion Beam Technology For Optical Applications
The Golden Ratio In Optics
Prospects And Challenges For Waveguide Nonlinear Optical Materials
Optical Drawing Standards Focus On “How,” Not “What”
The Life And Times Of Roy G. Biv
A Talk with Anne L’Huillier
UK Defense Ministry Targets Laser, RF Weapons
Algorithm Clears Up Underwater Images