Robert E. Parks
Now that an ANSI accredited optical standards infrastructure has been established as ANSI PH3.OP, it needs support in the form of dues and technically skilled personnel. Those who make optical instruments stand to benefit from their efforts. In fact, the marketing departments of optical manufacturers have much to gain and, thus, should contribute a large share of that support.
At first glance, this suggestion may not make sense. What good is ANSI PH3.OP to marketing professionals? Consider a case in point. Several manufacturers of phase measuring interferometry (PMI) equipment have independently raised the question of "How should a peak-to-valley error be defined?". Should 100% of the tens of thousands of possibly noisy data points be considered or some slightly smaller fraction? And what if different manufacturers decide on different percentages?
Log in or Become a member to view the full text of this article.
This article may be available for purchase via the search at www.osapublishing.org.
OSA Members get the full text of Optics & Photonics News, plus a variety of other member benefits.
Publish Date: 01 April 1991
Technical writing and word processing using TeX
Reaching the Shot Noise Limit For $10
Hubble: Looking for answers
Hubble: Looking for the trouble
Hubble: A mirror up to (human) nature
Liquid crystals: Unusual materials with a picturesque future!
The Laser Medicine's Troubled Adolescent
Computer-Generated Phase-Only Holograms for 3D Displays: A MATLAB Approach
Lighting a Better Path to 3D-Printed Hydrogels
Reconfigurable Metasurfaces Control Light Precisely