CLEO: DNA and Diamonds at the Wednesday Plenary

By Patricia Daukantas

Most molecular biologists stare down at throngs of their tiny subjects the way an aerial photographer captures a large pack of runners at a marathon. Steven Block wants to focus on a single molecule, just like zooming in to study the guy who broke out of the pack to win the marathon four times.

That’s how Block, a professor of both biology and physics at Stanford University, set the stage for his Wednesday morning CLEO plenary talk on single-molecule biophysics with optical tweezers. I’m not an expert on biology by any stretch -- even my high-school biology class is sadly out of date now -- but I’ll try to convey what he said as best I can.

RNA polymerase, the enzyme that produces RNA, is a sophisticated nanomachine, and scientists would like to know how it works. Humans have three or four kinds of RNA polymerase; it’s the stuff that makes our cells differentiate themselves by function, even though each chromosome has the same DNA. On the scale of proteins, RNA polymerase is pretty big -- about 3,300 amino acids -- but on the scale of things in general, it’s pretty small -- roughly 10 nm big.

Optical tweezers are “the closest thing humans have made to a tractor beam,” Block said after showing his grad-school-days video of a single bacterium stuck in an optical trap. His experiments with then-grad-student Will Greenleaf and colleagues, as I understand them, involved setting up two tiny dielectric spheres in side-by-side traps and stretching a single DNA molecule back and forth between them. They did this in order to study riboswitches, which are non-coding messenger RNA (mRNA) strands that control gene expression by changing structure when they selectively bind to a molecule. More experiments are forthcoming, even though Greenleaf is now a postdoc at Harvard University.

David Awschalom, the QELS plenary speaker from the University of California at Santa Barbara, talked about something else that’s darned tiny: single electron spins in semiconductors.

Much like photons, electron spin ensembles exhibit coherence in doped semiconductors. Much research into semiconductor spins has been done with low-temperature ensembles, Awschalom said, but tremendous progress has been made over the last five years into the study of single spins in solid-state matter.

Diamond -- that glittering crystal of carbon -- is a CMOS-compatible (both p- and n-type) semiconductor with remarkable thermal properties. Awschalom and his colleagues study synthetic diamonds with certain impurities called nitrogen-vacancy centers, in which two neighboring points of the carbon crystal lattice are replaced by a nitrogen atom and a gap with no atom. (Diamond gemstones with many of these impurities look yellowish.)

Again, the way I understand these experiments, the team shone polarized light through a diamond at room temperature and used a confocal microscope to spatially map the photoluminescence pattern and thus measure the single spins. In a paper published last December in Science, the team described how these single spins can flip on the order of 1 ns, which is about five times faster than the RAM in a modern desktop computer operates. Paradoxically, performance improves with increasing temperature -- not the way conventional electronic devices work.

Arrays of these tiny spins within diamonds could have many uses in quantum computing and communications -- and many other kinds of defects in diamonds have yet to be explored. To keep up with Awschalom’s research group, check out http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~awschalom.

Posted on May 20, 2010 02:53 by OPN

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: 2010-05 May | Lasers, CLEO | Lasers | Biomedical optics | CLEO/QELS

Highlighting a Historical Experiment in Diffraction

By Patricia Daukantas

 

Three physicists have figured out how to recreate a famous X-ray-diffraction experiment with a laser and other simple equipment. Their goal is to enable undergraduate students to follow in the footsteps of a chemical physicist who helped to decode the structure of DNA.

 

Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958), a young British scientist, took the famous X-ray diffraction image that was critical to identifying the structure of DNA as a double helix. Heidrun Schmitzer, Dennis Tierney and Gregory Braun of Xavier University (Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.) include Franklin in their undergraduate course for non-majors on “Women Who Shaped Physics.” Featured scientists in the course include Marie Curie, Lise Meitner, Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Maria Goeppert-Mayer.

 

In their poster paper at this week’s American Physical Society March meeting in Portland, Ore. (U.S.A.), Schmitzer and her colleagues described the classroom experiment, which requires only simple tools: a red laser and the spring from a retractable ballpoint pen. Shining the laser beam through the spring projects a diffraction pattern strikingly similar to Franklin’s famous image. See the Xavier group’s photo of diffracted light and compare it to the X-ray image from 57 years ago (and an accompanying mathematical analysis).

 

By comparing the geometry of the pen spring to the diffraction pattern of the light, and then studying the Franklin X-ray image at its original size, the students “can determine the angle, pitch and radius of the DNA molecule, just like Rosalind Franklin,” Schmitzer wrote in the abstract.

 

Last night I did a quick trial of this with a spring from an old pen, my cats’ favorite laser pointer and a darkened room. Unlike Schmitzer, I did not block the bright center maximum with anything, so my result wasn’t as visually stunning. But I could see some evidence of the “X” pattern with faint characteristic stripes. I suspect that, with a bit more equipment and refined technique, this could make a stunning classroom demonstration.

Posted on March 18, 2010 00:37 by OPN

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Categories: 2010-03 March | Biomedical optics | Optics history